Author Conversation: Kill Chain – The Failure of Military Technology, Drones, and the Military/Industrial Machine


The military knows much of its technology is effectively neutralized by off-the-shelf software, men on motorcycles, and cattle. In fact, in the $250 million Millennium Challenge 2002 war simulation, General Paul Van Riper played the poorly-equipped enemy and totally defeated the combined technological prowess of the joint U.S. military command in front of Donald Rumsfeld. Van Riper simulated the sinking of 14 U.S. warships. It was so bad they had to restart the games and Van Riper quit in disgust. The military/industrial complex has been investing trillions in technology that does not work as it should. It puts our soldiers in danger and leads to counter-productive policies such as drones. Did you know that drones have 20/200 vision and would be legally blind in a driver’s test? On a scale of 1 to 9 where 1 is the identification of a jumbo jet and 9 is the identification of a human face, the drone only scores 2.7. Yet, we use this legal blindness to order wildly inaccurate killings in the middle east. Drones are so disregarded by terrorists that they can hire someone to install roadside bombs for only $15. However, innocent civilians who want to love America hate drones for the destruction of families and communities. Listen to more stories in one of the most amazing conversations you’ll ever hear with military specialist and author Andrew Cockburn.

Guest: Andrew Cockburn
Learn more at: Henry Holt and Company

Egberto Willies
Common Cause
Coffee Party USA Book Club
Friday Thank You

Music Featured:
“The 99” by Tom Neilson

This show sponsored in part by



About Author

Profile photo of Tim Danahey

The Tim Danahey Show started in July, 2010 at internet station Castle Rock Radio. It started as a one-day-per week endeavor and quickly grew to five days per week. The show discusses economics, government, social issues, history, and non-fiction books in a magazine format featuring in-depth conversations with guests. Politics and inflammatory conversations are discouraged as they are divisive and counter-productive. Instead, the show seeks under-reported topics and delves into facts, different perspectives, and ramifications of each perspective.